TEN GOOD PRACTICES IN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTITUTIONALISM: STRUCTURE, TEXT AND JUSTICIABILITY

Autores

  • James R. May Widener University
  • Erin Daly Widener University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14210/nej.v22n3.p964-990

Palavras-chave:

Environmental constitutionalism, Environmental outcomes, Justiciability

Resumo

Environmental constitutionalism is a relatively recent phenomenon at the confluence of constitutional law, international law, human rights, and environmental law. It embodies the recognition that the environment is a proper subject for protection in constitutional texts and for vindication by constitutional courts worldwide. This chapter posits ten “good practices” – those attributes that make effective outcomes more likely, but not assured – in environmental constitutionalism for advancing positive environmental outcomes considering energy, and governance and sustainability. Good practices in environmental constitutionalism can serve as a useful construct for considering the relationship between sustainability, energy and governance. Accordingly, Section A examines the ten practices that are consequential for effectuating environmental constitutionalism and positive environmental outcomes. Section B then explains how the Robinson Township decision out of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in the United States provides a recent example just how good practices can have a positive impact on environmental outcomes in practice.

Referências

ARGENTINA. Argentina Constitution. 1994.

BANDI, Gyula. ‘The Right to Environment in Theory and Practice: The Hungarian Experience.’ Conn. J. Int’l. L. v. 8, 1993.

BRUCH, Carl; COKER, Wole; VANARSDALE, Chris. ‘Constitutional Environmental Law: Giving Force to Fundamental Principles in Africa.’ Colum. J. Envtl. L, v. 26, p. 166-176, 2001.

DALy, Erin. “The Ecuadorian Exemplar: The First Ever Vindications Of Constitutional Rights Of Nature.” RECIEL, v. 21, n. 1, 2012. Available at: http://celdf.live2.radicaldesigns.org/ downloads/The_Ecuadorian_Exemplar_The_First_Ever_Vindications_of_Constitutional_Rights_ of_Nature.pdf.

GELLERS, Joshua. Survival of the Greenest: A Statistical Analysis of Constitutional Environmental Rights, 2012. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2103960.

GLOBAL ALLIANCE FOR THE RIGHTS OF NATURE. Turkey calling for ecological constitution. Avaiable at: http://therightsofnature.org/rights-of-nature-laws/turkey-ecologicalconstitution/.

Hayward, Tim. Constitutional Environmental Rights, 25–58. Oxford University Press, 2005.

HILL, Barry E.; WOLFSON, Steve; TARG, Nicholas. “Human Rights and the Environment: A Synopsis and Some Predications.” Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. v. 16, 2004.

JUNG, Courtney; ROSEVEAR, Evan. Economic and Social Rights Across Time, Regions, and Legal Traditions: A Preliminary Analysis of the TIESR Dataset. 30 Nordic Jrnl. Hum. Rights, 2012.

MAy, James R. ‘Constituting Fundamental Environmental Rights Worldwide.’ Pace Envtl. L. Rev. v. 23, p. 113, 2006. MAy, James R.; DALy, Erin. ‘Vindicating Fundamental Environmental Rights Worldwide.’ Ore. Rev. Intl. L. v. 11, p. 365-440, 2010. MAy, James R.; Daly, Erin. ‘Constitutional Environmental Rights Worldwide.’ In: May, James R. Principles of Constitutional Environmental Law. ABA Publishing, Environmental Law Institute, 2011.

MAy, James R.; DALy, Erin. ‘Global Constitutional Environmental Rights.’ In: ALAM, Shawkat; BHUIyAN, Jahid Hossain; CHOWDHURy, Tareq M.R.; TECHERA, Erika J. Routledge Handbook of International Environmental Law. Routledge, 2012.

MAy, James R.; DALy, Erin. ‘New Directors in Earth Rights, Environmental Rights and Human Rights: Six Facets of Constitutionally Embedded Environmental Rights Worldwide.’ IUCN Academy of Environmental Law E-Journal. v. 1, 2011.

ONzIVU, William. ‘International Environmental Law, The Public’s Health, and Domestic Environmental Governance in Developing Countries.’ Am. U. Int’l. L. Rev. v. 21, 2006.

PLESSIS, Louis J. Kotze; Anél du. ‘Some Brief Observations on Fifteen years of Environmental Rights Jurisprudence in South Africa.’ Journal of Court Innovations. v. 3, 2010.

SHELTON, Dinah. “Human Rights and the Environment: What Specific Environmental Rights Have Been Recognized?” Denv. J. Int’l L. & Pol’y. v. 35, 2006.

SRIPATI, Vijayashri. Human Rights in India – Fifty years after Independence. 26 Denv. J. Int‘l L. & Pol‘y, 1997.

VIDAL, John. Bolivia enshrines natural world’s rights with equal status for Mother Earth. Avaiable at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/apr/10/bolivia-enshrinesnatural-worlds-rights

WHEELER c. Director de la Procuraduria General Del Estado de Loja Juicio, No. 111212011-0010 (‘Wheeler’). Available at http://blogs.law.widener.edu/envirolawblog/2011/07/12/ ecuadorian-courtrecognizes-constitutional-right-to-nature/.

Downloads

Publicado

2017-12-13

Como Citar

MAY, J. R.; DALY, E. TEN GOOD PRACTICES IN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTITUTIONALISM: STRUCTURE, TEXT AND JUSTICIABILITY. Novos Estudos Jurí­dicos, Itajaí­ (SC), v. 22, n. 3, p. 964–990, 2017. DOI: 10.14210/nej.v22n3.p964-990. Disponível em: https://periodicos.univali.br/index.php/nej/article/view/12115. Acesso em: 26 abr. 2024.

Edição

Seção

Artigos